korrents
David Deutsch

David Deutsch

@david-deutsch · 15 positions · 0 changes of mind

Physicist at the University of Oxford and a pioneer of quantum computation; author of The Fabric of Reality (1997) and The Beginning of Infinity (2011).

Cited by Naval RavikantSee it on the map

David Deutsch did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

Filter All topics · Newest first
  1. measuring intelligenceAGI

    The enterprise of achieving it artificially — the field of ‘artificial general intelligence’ or AGI — has made no progress whatever during the entire six decades of its existence.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 1st of 15 in this piece

  2. AGIphysics

    Despite this long record of failure, AGI must be possible. And that is because of a deep property of the laws of physics, namely the universality of computation.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 2nd of 15 in this piece

  3. creativity

    I call the core functionality in question creativity: the ability to produce new explanations.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 3rd of 15 in this piece

  4. Because it is simply not true that knowledge comes from extrapolating repeated observations.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 4th of 15 in this piece

  5. Now, the truth is that knowledge consists of conjectured explanations — guesses about what really is (or really should be, or might be) out there in all those worlds. Even in the hard sciences, these guesses have no foundations and don’t need justification.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 5th of 15 in this piece

  6. Thinking consists of criticising and correcting partially true guesses with the intention of locating and eliminating the errors and misconceptions in them, not generating or justifying extrapolations from sense data.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 6th of 15 in this piece

  7. AGImathematics

    Currently one of the most influential versions of the ‘induction’ approach to AGI (and to the philosophy of science) is Bayesianism, unfairly named after the 18th-century mathematician Thomas Bayes, who was quite innocent of the mistake.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 7th of 15 in this piece

  8. AGI

    An AGI is qualitatively, not quantitatively, different from all other computer programs.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 8th of 15 in this piece

  9. AGI

    Expecting to create an AGI without first understanding in detail how it works is like expecting skyscrapers to learn to fly if we build them tall enough.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 9th of 15 in this piece

  10. That AGIs are people has been implicit in the very concept from the outset.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 10th of 15 in this piece

  11. To treat AGIs like any other computer programs would constitute brainwashing, slavery, and tyranny.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 11th of 15 in this piece

  12. The battle between good and evil ideas is as old as our species and will continue regardless of the hardware on which it is running.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 12th of 15 in this piece

  13. education

    One implication is that we must stop regarding education (of humans or AGIs alike) as instruction — as a means of transmitting existing knowledge unaltered, and causing existing values to be enacted obediently.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 13th of 15 in this piece

  14. AGI

    I am convinced that the whole problem of developing AGIs is a matter of philosophy, not computer science or neurophysiology

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 14th of 15 in this piece

  15. AGI

    So in one respect I can agree with the AGI-is-imminent camp: it is plausible that just a single idea stands between us and the breakthrough.

    ↗How close are we to creating artificial intelligence?aeon.co 15th of 15 in this piece