korrents
Chelsea Finn

What Chelsea Finn thinks about reinforcement learning

@chelsea-finn · 22 positions · On ppll ↗

Assistant professor of computer science at Stanford, and co-founder of the robot foundation-model company Physical Intelligence.

Chelsea Finn did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

2 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Chelsea Finn has said — not written or endorsed by them.

2 positions so far — this page is not yet offered to search engines.

  1. LLMsrobotics

    Now maybe this isn't completely out of the question but this would be quite challenging uh to do and that's because the calculus is a little bit different. We're not just running compute to optimize for a use case. We're actually running the robot in the real world and using the hardware and attempting the task in the real world.

    ↗Chelsea Finn: This is the State of the Art in Roboticsyoutube.com 4th of 22 in this recording

  2. scaling lawsrobotics

    we see that the across the board the single PIO like pre-trained PIO7 model matches or outperforms the fine-tuned specialists that were developed with reinforcement learning post-training for those downstream tasks.

    ↗Chelsea Finn: This is the State of the Art in Roboticsyoutube.com 11th of 22 in this recording