korrents

korrents · piece

Carol Dweck Revisits the 'Growth Mindset' (Education Week)

Carol Dweck · 22 Sept 2015

Read the piece on edweek.org ↗

8 korrents from this piece ↓

Carol Dweck did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. A growth mindset isn’t just about effort. Perhaps the most common misconception is simply equating the growth mindset with effort.
  2. Students need to try new strategies and seek input from others when they’re stuck. They need this repertoire of approaches—not just sheer effort—to learn and improve.
  3. It is about telling the truth about a student’s current achievement and then, together, doing something about it, helping him or her become smarter.
  4. Must it always come back to finding a reason why some children just can’t learn, as opposed to finding a way to help them learn? Teachers who understand the growth mindset do everything in their power to unlock that learning.
  5. But the path to a growth mindset is a journey, not a proclamation.
  6. Let’s acknowledge that (1) we’re all a mixture of fixed and growth mindsets, (2) we will probably always be, and (3) if we want to move closer to a growth mindset in our thoughts and practices, we need to stay in touch with our fixed-mindset thoughts and deeds.
  7. If we “ban” the fixed mindset, we will surely create false growth-mindsets. (By the way, I also fear that if we use mindset measures for accountability, we will create false growth mindsets on an unprecedented scale.)
  8. Maybe we originally put too much emphasis on sheer effort. Maybe we made the development of a growth mindset sound too easy.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.