17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 28 Oct 2011 to 16 Sept 2026.
At the centre
What engineers will stay valuable for is being answerable for a system — the named person who decides what ships, what is blocked and what is deferred, whoever or whatever wrote the code.
Last stated 19 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Addy Osmani
Read this korrent →
-
Similar wording
Engineers should be able to explain any customer-facing system they have shipped and defend the decisions they made.
Last stated 16 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Mitchell Hashimoto
-
Similar wording
There is no point arguing about whether or when engineers will ship code they have not read; the only useful question is what it would take.
Last stated 12 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Charity Majors
-
Similar wording
Engineers are hired to create business value rather than to program things, and the only goals are adding revenue and cutting costs.
Last stated 28 Oct 2011 · 15 years ago
Holds
Patrick McKenzie
-
Similar wording
Letting engineers build without designers does not replace the designer or make designers less valuable; it lets everybody move faster while keeping high standards.
Last stated 15 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Nev Flynn
-
Similar wording
The system becomes the centerpiece of all successful engineering work, because the more a tool is relied on to create the code, the more a system is relied on to tell that tool what to code.
Last stated 10 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Luis Ouriach
-
Similar wording
If a hundred-times-more-productive engineer still works eight hours a day, the company captures all of the new value and the engineer none of it.
Last stated 11 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Steve Yegge
-
Similar wording
Redefining the engineer's job as building guardrails is not novel — it is the same problem as making a junior engineer effective, which we never solved either.
Last stated 27 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
Dax Raad
-
Similar wording
Any system design will someday be bettered by someone.
Last stated c. 1968
Holds
Melvin Conway
-
Same subject: AI and human skill
A machine doing your work better than you is no reason to stop doing it, because the point of the work was never that only you could do it.
Last stated 2 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
L. M. Sacasas
-
Same subject: AI and human skill
A skill being automated is not a reason to stop learning it: practising what machines already do is often the stepping stone to what only people can do.
Last stated 18 Nov 2025 · 11 months ago
Holds
Scott H. Young
-
Same subject: AI and human skill
A well-written email does not need an AI summary, and an executive who delegates his reading to one has stopped doing the job.
Last stated 21 May 2025 · a year ago
Holds
Ed Zitron
-
Same subject: coding agents
"I don't know" becomes a kind of superpower when you can work with Claude Code to figure things out.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Kris Puckett
-
Same subject: coding agents
A coding agent does not learn from its mistakes the way a person does -- it repeats the same error indefinitely unless a human notices and writes it down.
Last stated 25 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Mario Zechner
-
Same subject: coding agents
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated 18 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds
Clay Bavor
-
Same subject: AI agents
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Last stated 21 May 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds
Rohit Krishnan
-
Same subject: AI agents
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Last stated 15 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Tobias Lütke
-
Same subject: AI agents
A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Peter Steinberger