korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

The test of a scientific model is not whether supporting evidence can be found for it, but whether it fits the totality of the evidence.

Drawn from what Stephan Guyenet said

Interesting
A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Stephan Guyenet actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Stephan Guyenet

    Obesity researcher with a PhD in neuroscience

    The question we must answer is not “can we find evidence that supports the CIM”, but rather “does the CIM provide the best fit for the totality of the evidence”.

    Where this was said

    ↗Why the carbohydrate-insulin model of obesity is probably wrong: A supplementary reply to Ebbeling and Ludwig’s JAMA articlestephanguyenet.com

    All 4 korrents from this piecethis one is 3rd

Added to korrents 3 Jul 2018 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

On the map

Loading the map… or open it on its own page

Open the map on its own page →