Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← The release of Opus 4.5 in November 2025 was the dividing line,…
17 connected korrents · 16 moments on record from 18 Mar 2024 to 26 Aug 2026.
Everything filed under Anthropic
Anthropic
Everything filed under OpenAI
OpenAI
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under Microsoft
Microsoft
Everything filed under vibe coding
vibe coding
Everything filed under MCP
MCP
Everything filed under MCP
MCP Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: The release of Opus 4.5 in November 2025 was the dividing line, because it was the first time an agent produced work uncannily close to what its user would have written themselves. The release of Opus 4.5 in November 2025 was the dividing line, because it was the first time an agent produced work uncannily close to what its user would have written themselves. Last stated 2 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The interesting question is not what the next model will be able to do, but what the models already released can do that nobody has worked out yet. — tap to centre the map on it The interesting question is not what the next model will be able to do, but what the models already released can do that nobody has worked out yet. Last stated 6 months ago
19 Mar 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Trusting model-written code you have not read became defensible only with Opus 4.5, and only for classes of problem you have already watched a model handle. — tap to centre the map on it Trusting model-written code you have not read became defensible only with Opus 4.5, and only for classes of problem you have already watched a model handle. Last stated 6 months ago
19 Mar 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-03-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The way software gets built flipped in December: writing code yourself is now the exception, not the default. — tap to centre the map on it The way software gets built flipped in December: writing code yourself is now the exception, not the default. Last stated 6 months ago
20 Mar 2026
AK
Andrej Karpathy — holds since 2026-03-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau. — tap to centre the map on it The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau. Last stated a month ago
7 Aug 2026
FC
François Chollet — no longer holds since 2026-08-07 — tap for who they are
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The gap between GPT-5 and GPT-4 will be as large as the gap between GPT-4 and GPT-3, and the job is to live a few years ahead and remember that today's tools will look terrible from there. — tap to centre the map on it The gap between GPT-5 and GPT-4 will be as large as the gap between GPT-4 and GPT-3, and the job is to live a few years ahead and remember that today's tools will look terrible from there. Last stated 2 years ago
18 Mar 2024
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2024-03-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Scaling the 2019-2023 recipe — same architecture, bigger model, more data — is not enough; further progress depends on new architectural ideas. — tap to centre the map on it Scaling the 2019-2023 recipe — same architecture, bigger model, more data — is not enough; further progress depends on new architectural ideas. Last stated 2 years ago
20 Dec 2024
FC
François Chollet — holds since 2024-12-20 — tap for who they are
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2024-10-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models. — tap to centre the map on it A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models. Last stated 6 months ago
11 Mar 2026
SY
Steve Yegge — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself. — tap to centre the map on it A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself. Last stated 2 weeks ago
26 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop. — tap to centre the map on it AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop. Last stated 2 months ago
28 Jun 2026
PL
Pieter Levels — holds since 2026-06-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Anthropic pulling Claude subscriptions from third-party harnesses like OpenCode is a mistake: playing a single match in a game of many rounds. — tap to centre the map on it Anthropic pulling Claude subscriptions from third-party harnesses like OpenCode is a mistake: playing a single match in a game of many rounds. Last stated 5 months ago
8 Apr 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-04-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Coding agents should read the shared AGENTS.md convention; insisting on a tool-specific CLAUDE.md creates split-brain problems across a team. — tap to centre the map on it Coding agents should read the shared AGENTS.md convention; insisting on a tool-specific CLAUDE.md creates split-brain problems across a team. Last stated 2 weeks ago
25 Aug 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-08-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Google currently has no leading frontier AI model and no agentic coding tool comparable to Codex or Claude Code — tap to centre the map on it Google currently has no leading frontier AI model and no agentic coding tool comparable to Codex or Claude Code Last stated 2 months ago
23 Jul 2026
EM
Ethan Mollick — holds since 2026-07-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: His opinion of AI never changed; the circumstances and the facts did, when agent harnesses and Opus 4.5 made the tools good enough. — tap to centre the map on it His opinion of AI never changed; the circumstances and the facts did, when agent harnesses and Opus 4.5 made the tools good enough. Last stated 5 months ago
8 Apr 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-04-08 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Letting a coding agent live-edit the production server works fine in practice. — tap to centre the map on it Letting a coding agent live-edit the production server works fine in practice. Last stated 2 months ago
28 Jun 2026
PL
Pieter Levels — holds since 2026-06-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: MCP may turn out to be a one-year wonder, because coding agents that can run arbitrary shell commands make Bash the best general-purpose tool interface. — tap to centre the map on it MCP may turn out to be a one-year wonder, because coding agents that can run arbitrary shell commands make Bash the best general-purpose tool interface. Last stated 8 months ago
31 Dec 2025
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2025-12-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked. — tap to centre the map on it MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked. Last stated a year ago
25 Aug 2025
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2025-08-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context. — tap to centre the map on it Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context. Last stated 7 months ago
12 Feb 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-02-12 — tap for who they are
At the centre
The release of Opus 4.5 in November 2025 was the dividing line, because it was the first time an agent produced work uncannily close to what its user would have written themselves.
Holds Read this korrent →
The interesting question is not what the next model will be able to do, but what the models already released can do that nobody has worked out yet.
Holds
Trusting model-written code you have not read became defensible only with Opus 4.5, and only for classes of problem you have already watched a model handle.
Holds
The way software gets built flipped in December: writing code yourself is now the exception, not the default.
Holds
The LLM line of research will reach a capability plateau.
Holds GM Gary MarcusNo longer holds
The gap between GPT-5 and GPT-4 will be as large as the gap between GPT-4 and GPT-3, and the job is to live a few years ahead and remember that today's tools will look terrible from there.
Holds
Scaling the 2019-2023 recipe — same architecture, bigger model, more data — is not enough; further progress depends on new architectural ideas.
Holds GM Gary Marcus
A company that handed its engineers Copilot and thinks it is now moving faster will be destroyed by the people using frontier models.
Holds SY Steve Yegge
A sense of achievement in software survives writing almost none of the code yourself.
Holds
AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop.
Holds
Anthropic pulling Claude subscriptions from third-party harnesses like OpenCode is a mistake: playing a single match in a game of many rounds.
Holds
Coding agents should read the shared AGENTS.md convention; insisting on a tool-specific CLAUDE.md creates split-brain problems across a team.
Holds
Google currently has no leading frontier AI model and no agentic coding tool comparable to Codex or Claude Code
Holds EM Ethan Mollick
His opinion of AI never changed; the circumstances and the facts did, when agent harnesses and Opus 4.5 made the tools good enough.
Holds
Letting a coding agent live-edit the production server works fine in practice.
Holds
MCP may turn out to be a one-year wonder, because coding agents that can run arbitrary shell commands make Bash the best general-purpose tool interface.
Holds
MCP servers are worth removing outright: an agent reading the code directly is faster, and pollutes its context less, than one that can reach for a tool unasked.
Holds
Every tool is better as a CLI than as an MCP server: models are good at Unix commands, a CLI composes with jq, and MCP output clutters the context.
Holds