korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

Peer review is one of the things genuinely wrong with academia, not a safeguard that mostly works.

Drawn from what Adam Mastroianni and Alexey Guzey said

Subjectpeer review
What this subject means

peer review How science checks itself, and the case that the checking mostly does not work.

Interesting
A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What they actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Adam Mastroianni Peer review doesn’t work and there’s probably no way to fix it. experimental-history.com

    Experimental psychologist with a PhD from Harvard

    Their wordsPeer review doesn’t work and there’s probably no way to fix it.

    Where this was said

    ↗The rise and fall of peer reviewexperimental-history.com

    All 8 korrents from this piecethis one is 7th

  2. Alexey Guzey Specific parts of academia that seem to be problematic: rigid, punishing for deviation, career progression; peer review; need to constantly fundraise for professors. guzey.com

    Writer and founder of New Science

    Their wordsSpecific parts of academia that seem to be problematic: rigid, punishing for deviation, career progression; peer review; need to constantly fundraise for professors.

    Where this was said

    ↗How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigationguzey.com

    All 4 korrents from this piecethis one is 3rd

Added to korrents 13 Dec 2022 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Holders over time
Holders over time
012 Aug 2019 Sept 2026
Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

On the map

Loading the map… or open it on its own page

Open the map on its own page →