korrents

Our readingWhat is a korrent?

Peer review is one of the things genuinely wrong with academia, not a safeguard that mostly works.

Drawn from what Adam Mastroianni and Alexey Guzey said

What this subject means

peer review How science checks itself, and the case that the checking mostly does not work.

What they actually said

  1. Adam Mastroianni Peer review doesn’t work and there’s probably no way to fix it. The rise and fall of peer reviewexperimental-history.com · 13 Dec 2022All 8 korrents from this piece
    Peer review doesn’t work and there’s probably no way to fix it.
  2. Alexey Guzey Writer and founder of New Science Specific parts of academia that seem to be problematic: rigid, punishing for deviation, career progression; peer review; need to constantly fundraise for professors. How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigationguzey.com · 15 Aug 2019All 4 korrents from this piece
    Specific parts of academia that seem to be problematic: rigid, punishing for deviation, career progression; peer review; need to constantly fundraise for professors.

Added to korrents 7 Sept 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Holders over time
Holders over time
012 Aug 2019 Oct 2026

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

I hold this too

Related korrents

Shared subject first, then similar wording. They may agree or disagree.

See this claim on the map