Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← In an arms race in AI and bioengineering it does not matter who wins, because the loser will be humanity
17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 23 Jan 2020 to 18 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under AGI
AGI
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under AI and jobs
AI and jobs
Everything filed under AI and human skill
AI and human skill
Everything filed under China
China Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: In an arms race in AI and bioengineering it does not matter who wins, because the loser will be humanity In an arms race in AI and bioengineering it does not matter who wins, because the loser will be humanity Last stated 7 years ago
23 Jan 2020
YH
Yuval Noah Harari — holds since 2020-01-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In bioengineering humans, societies that go slowly and safely will have the advantage, unlike in AI where an arms race is almost inevitable — tap to centre the map on it In bioengineering humans, societies that go slowly and safely will have the advantage, unlike in AI where an arms race is almost inevitable Last stated 3 years ago
11 Jan 2024
YH
Yuval Noah Harari — holds since 2024-01-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AIs fighting AIs on behalf of humans is more likely than AI fighting humanity. — tap to centre the map on it AIs fighting AIs on behalf of humans is more likely than AI fighting humanity. Last stated a month ago
16 Sept 2026
NR
Naval Ravikant — holds since 2026-09-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Humans cannot out-compete AI by trying to match or exceed its raw output volume. — tap to centre the map on it Humans cannot out-compete AI by trying to match or exceed its raw output volume. Last stated 4 months ago
10 Jun 2026
JS
Jasmine Sun — holds since 2026-06-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Competing with AI in producing outputs is a losing game; human advantages should be used to work with AI on things neither could do alone. — tap to centre the map on it Competing with AI in producing outputs is a losing game; human advantages should be used to work with AI on things neither could do alone. Last stated a month ago
18 Sept 2026
EM
Ethan Mollick — holds since 2026-09-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company. — tap to centre the map on it Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company. Last stated 11 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: People will matter more in an AI future, not less, and giving them better tools is what makes that future a good one. — tap to centre the map on it People will matter more in an AI future, not less, and giving them better tools is what makes that future a good one. Last stated 4 months ago
10 Jun 2026
MZ
Mark Zuckerberg — holds since 2026-06-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: It will be easier to build an AI that cares about all sentient life than one that cares about humans alone, because the AI itself will be sentient. — tap to centre the map on it It will be easier to build an AI that cares about all sentient life than one that cares about humans alone, because the AI itself will be sentient. Last stated 11 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans. — tap to centre the map on it In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans. Last stated a month ago
14 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. — tap to centre the map on it A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. Last stated 5 months ago
4 Jun 2026
AI
Alex Imas — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. — tap to centre the map on it A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. Last stated a year ago
7 Jun 2025
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality — tap to centre the map on it A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality Last stated 3 years ago
10 Oct 2023
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2023-10-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. — tap to centre the map on it A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. Last stated 5 months ago
21 May 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-05-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. Last stated a month ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. — tap to centre the map on it A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. Last stated 2 months ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. Last stated 10 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. — tap to centre the map on it A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. Last stated 3 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls. — tap to centre the map on it A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls. Last stated a month ago
17 Sept 2026
PC
Patrick Collison — holds since 2026-09-17 — tap for who they are
At the centre
In an arms race in AI and bioengineering it does not matter who wins, because the loser will be humanity
Holds Read this korrent →
In bioengineering humans, societies that go slowly and safely will have the advantage, unlike in AI where an arms race is almost inevitable
Holds
AIs fighting AIs on behalf of humans is more likely than AI fighting humanity.
Holds
Humans cannot out-compete AI by trying to match or exceed its raw output volume.
Holds
Competing with AI in producing outputs is a losing game; human advantages should be used to work with AI on things neither could do alone.
Holds
Even with human-like learners, competition will split the AI market into specialised niches rather than hand it to one company.
Holds
People will matter more in an AI future, not less, and giving them better tools is what makes that future a good one.
Holds
It will be easier to build an AI that cares about all sentient life than one that cares about humans alone, because the AI itself will be sentient.
Holds
In a race to beat China on AI, the winners would be the AIs rather than humans.
Holds
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
Holds
A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted.
Holds
A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality
Holds
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Holds
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Holds
A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor.
Holds
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Holds
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Holds
A body of publications is easy for AI models to consume via pretraining corpora but cumbersome for most humans due to CAPTCHAs, accounts, and paywalls.
Holds