Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Every user of a piece of software can intuitively tell how much the people who made it cared about it.
17 connected korrents · 17 moments from 24 Aug 2009 to 23 Sept 2026.
Everything filed under software quality
software quality
Everything filed under design
design
Everything filed under vibe coding
vibe coding
Everything filed under the cloud
the cloud
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under developer tools
developer tools
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under startups
startups
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: Every user of a piece of software can intuitively tell how much the people who made it cared about it.
Every user of a piece of software can intuitively tell how much the people who made it cared about it.
Last stated 12 months ago
10 Nov 2025
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2025-11-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Once you control the ideas behind a piece of software, reviewing the code itself becomes largely unnecessary. — tap to centre the map on it
Once you control the ideas behind a piece of software, reviewing the code itself becomes largely unnecessary.
Last stated 4 months ago
13 Jul 2026
SS
Salvatore Sanfilippo — holds since 2026-07-13 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The cloud and the web were built for people, with every layer assuming a human is watching. — tap to centre the map on it
The cloud and the web were built for people, with every layer assuming a human is watching.
Last stated 3 months ago
2 Aug 2026
RK
Rita Kozlov — holds since 2026-08-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Everyone, however experienced, is just scratching the surface of these AI tools and still figuring out how to use everything at their disposal. — tap to centre the map on it
Everyone, however experienced, is just scratching the surface of these AI tools and still figuring out how to use everything at their disposal.
Last stated 5 months ago
16 Jun 2026
BW
Brett Williams — holds since 2026-06-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: When there are thoughtful users you can really tell, and they are the ones with a deeper appreciation or deeper criticism of what in the product experience is working or not. — tap to centre the map on it
When there are thoughtful users you can really tell, and they are the ones with a deeper appreciation or deeper criticism of what in the product experience is working or not.
Last stated 2 months ago
25 Aug 2026
JB
John Bai — holds since 2026-08-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: People should make software that exactly meets their own and their friends' needs. — tap to centre the map on it
People should make software that exactly meets their own and their friends' needs.
Last stated 2 months ago
30 Aug 2026
TS
Tara Seshan — holds since 2026-08-30 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Giving people access to tools for building software does not make most of them software builders. — tap to centre the map on it
Giving people access to tools for building software does not make most of them software builders.
Last stated 7 months ago
20 Mar 2026
JF
Jason Fried — holds since 2026-03-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An AI coding assistant's tendency to infer what a user means rather than exactly what they typed is both its greatest strength and the reason it is hard to trust. — tap to centre the map on it
An AI coding assistant's tendency to infer what a user means rather than exactly what they typed is both its greatest strength and the reason it is hard to trust.
Last stated 9 months ago
22 Jan 2026
SK
Steve Klabnik — holds since 2026-01-22 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Which AI features users will love is genuinely unpredictable, and the ones a founder is most confident about are the ones that get used least. — tap to centre the map on it
Which AI features users will love is genuinely unpredictable, and the ones a founder is most confident about are the ones that get used least.
Last stated 2 years ago
23 Mar 2025
RV
Rahul Vohra — holds since 2025-03-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: 95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away. — tap to centre the map on it
95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away.
Last stated a month ago
23 Sept 2026
GT
Geoff Teehan — holds since 2026-09-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bug live for one day is better than an app stuck in review for two weeks. — tap to centre the map on it
A bug live for one day is better than an app stuck in review for two weeks.
Last stated 17 years ago
24 Aug 2009
JH
Joe Hewitt — holds since 2009-08-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair. — tap to centre the map on it
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated a year ago
18 Aug 2025
CB
Clay Bavor — holds since 2025-08-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results.
Last stated 9 months ago
9 Feb 2026
SH
Scott Hanselman — holds since 2026-02-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior.
Last stated 2 months ago
19 Aug 2026
JS
Jon Seager — holds since 2026-08-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI-generated code should not count as finished work until a human has reviewed and corrected it. — tap to centre the map on it
AI-generated code should not count as finished work until a human has reviewed and corrected it.
Last stated 7 months ago
1 Apr 2026
DJ
Daniel Jalkut — holds since 2026-04-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI. — tap to centre the map on it
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 4 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop. — tap to centre the map on it
Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop.
Last stated 5 months ago
7 Jun 2026
TF
Tony Fadell — holds since 2026-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great. — tap to centre the map on it
Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.
Last stated 4 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording a cloud: claims about one subject, named for it bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 2009 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are
At the centre
Every user of a piece of software can intuitively tell how much the people who made it cared about it.
Last stated 10 Nov 2025 · 12 months ago
Holds Tobias Lütke
Read this korrent →
Similar wording
Once you control the ideas behind a piece of software, reviewing the code itself becomes largely unnecessary.
Last stated 13 Jul 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Salvatore Sanfilippo
Similar wording
The cloud and the web were built for people, with every layer assuming a human is watching.
Last stated 2 Aug 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds Rita Kozlov
Similar wording
Everyone, however experienced, is just scratching the surface of these AI tools and still figuring out how to use everything at their disposal.
Last stated 16 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Brett Williams
Similar wording
When there are thoughtful users you can really tell, and they are the ones with a deeper appreciation or deeper criticism of what in the product experience is working or not.
Last stated 25 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds John Bai
Similar wording
People should make software that exactly meets their own and their friends' needs.
Last stated 30 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Tara Seshan
Similar wording
Giving people access to tools for building software does not make most of them software builders.
Last stated 20 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Jason Fried
Similar wording
An AI coding assistant's tendency to infer what a user means rather than exactly what they typed is both its greatest strength and the reason it is hard to trust.
Last stated 22 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago
Holds Steve Klabnik
Similar wording
Which AI features users will love is genuinely unpredictable, and the ones a founder is most confident about are the ones that get used least.
Last stated 23 Mar 2025 · 2 years ago
Holds Rahul Vohra
Same subject: software quality
95 percent of the software made in an age of abundance will be shitty, and shitty software is easy to deal with because it goes away.
Last stated 23 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds Geoff Teehan
Same subject: software quality
A bug live for one day is better than an app stuck in review for two weeks.
Last stated 24 Aug 2009 · 17 years ago
Holds Joe Hewitt
Same subject: software quality
A coding agent left to run over a weekend returns work that is half good, a quarter garbage and a quarter in need of repair.
Last stated 18 Aug 2025 · a year ago
Holds Clay Bavor
Same subject: code generation
AI-assisted coding will generate a lot of low-quality output that developers will need to clean up, even as it also produces good results.
Last stated 9 Feb 2026 · 9 months ago
Holds Scott Hanselman
Same subject: code generation
AI-generated code should be treated as untrusted until there is evidence it preserves the intended behavior.
Last stated 19 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds Jon Seager
Same subject: code generation
AI-generated code should not count as finished work until a human has reviewed and corrected it.
Last stated 1 Apr 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds Daniel Jalkut
Same subject: coding agents
A team that slows down and reads every pull request and every line of code should expect only a 30 to 50 percent productivity lift from AI.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy
Same subject: coding agents
Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop.
Last stated 7 Jun 2026 · 5 months ago
Holds Tony Fadell
Same subject: coding agents
Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 4 months ago
Holds Dex Horthy