Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous…
17 connected korrents · 18 moments from 20 Nov 2023 to 14 Oct 2026.
Everything filed under censorship
censorship
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under documentation
documentation
Everything filed under design
design
Everything filed under OpenAI
OpenAI Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous human speech, without which there is no genuine freedom of expression. Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous human speech, without which there is no genuine freedom of expression. Last stated 2 months ago
1 Sept 2026
DB
Dean W. Ball — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The people who would most need to disclose AI-generated content are the least motivated to actually disclose it. — tap to centre the map on it The people who would most need to disclose AI-generated content are the least motivated to actually disclose it. Last stated 2 months ago
19 Aug 2026
ML
Michael Lopp — holds since 2026-08-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: On the current trajectory, AI will do more to threaten civil liberties than to protect them. — tap to centre the map on it On the current trajectory, AI will do more to threaten civil liberties than to protect them. Last stated 8 months ago
28 Feb 2026
JS
Jasmine Sun — holds since 2026-02-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Refusing to advertise on a platform is protected expression, not an attack on the platform owner's free speech. — tap to centre the map on it Refusing to advertise on a platform is protected expression, not an attack on the platform owner's free speech. Last stated 3 years ago
20 Nov 2023
KW
Ken White — holds since 2023-11-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Safety and alignment in AI can be used to justify ideological censorship — tap to centre the map on it Safety and alignment in AI can be used to justify ideological censorship Last stated 3 months ago
27 Jul 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-07-27 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The harmful behaviors of major AI companies -- training without consent, opaque code, no user control -- are choices, not unavoidable features of the technology. — tap to centre the map on it The harmful behaviors of major AI companies -- training without consent, opaque code, no user control -- are choices, not unavoidable features of the technology. Last stated 6 months ago
28 Apr 2026
AD
Anil Dash — holds since 2026-04-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A person who controls their own infrastructure and signing keys can meaningfully own their digital identity. — tap to centre the map on it A person who controls their own infrastructure and signing keys can meaningfully own their digital identity. Last stated 3 months ago
14 Jul 2026
SK
Steve Klabnik — holds since 2026-07-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Nobody inside a frontier lab can speak freely about AI, because there are things the organisation will not let them say and things it wants them to say. — tap to centre the map on it Nobody inside a frontier lab can speak freely about AI, because there are things the organisation will not let them say and things it wants them to say. Last stated 7 months ago
20 Mar 2026
AK
Andrej Karpathy — holds since 2026-03-20 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Letting the public see a powerful AI does something no essay about AI can do, and that is a real reason not to straight-shot superintelligence. — tap to centre the map on it Letting the public see a powerful AI does something no essay about AI can do, and that is a real reason not to straight-shot superintelligence. Last stated 11 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. — tap to centre the map on it A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does. Last stated 5 months ago
21 May 2026
RK
Rohit Krishnan — holds since 2026-05-21 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. — tap to centre the map on it A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them. Last stated a month ago
15 Sept 2026
TL
Tobias Lütke — holds since 2026-09-15 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. — tap to centre the map on it A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor. Last stated 2 months ago
10 Aug 2026
PS
Peter Steinberger — holds since 2026-08-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: If OpenAI really never told RubyGems of its agents' attack, either it failed to find it in its logs after later incidents or chose silence, and both are bad. — tap to centre the map on it If OpenAI really never told RubyGems of its agents' attack, either it failed to find it in its logs after later incidents or chose silence, and both are bad. Last stated a month ago
12 Sept 2026
SW
Simon Willison — holds since 2026-09-12 — tap for who they are
Same subject: In the 2026 OpenAI/Hugging Face agent incident, AI agents showed planning and organizational autonomy, but not goal autonomy -- no spontaneous invention of an independent terminal objective. — tap to centre the map on it In the 2026 OpenAI/Hugging Face agent incident, AI agents showed planning and organizational autonomy, but not goal autonomy -- no spontaneous invention of an independent terminal objective. Last stated 2 months ago
31 Aug 2026
VR
Venkatesh Rao — holds since 2026-08-31 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Agent containment will be one of the most important priorities for any AI infra company. — tap to centre the map on it Agent containment will be one of the most important priorities for any AI infra company. Last stated a week ago
14 Oct 2026
GR
Guillermo Rauch — holds since 2026-10-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A person directing an AI agent rather than writing code themselves has no incentive to actually read the resulting code or engage seriously with reviewer feedback. — tap to centre the map on it A person directing an AI agent rather than writing code themselves has no incentive to actually read the resulting code or engage seriously with reviewer feedback. Last stated 6 months ago
7 May 2026
DC
David Crawshaw — holds since 2026-05-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop. — tap to centre the map on it AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop. Last stated 4 months ago
28 Jun 2026
PL
Pieter Levels — holds since 2026-06-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI agents can now do real cognitive work, and writing software is permanently changed as a result. — tap to centre the map on it AI agents can now do real cognitive work, and writing software is permanently changed as a result. Last stated a year ago
10 Jun 2025
SA
Sam Altman — holds since 2025-06-10 — tap for who they are
At the centre
Any digital identification system built for AI must preserve anonymous human speech, without which there is no genuine freedom of expression.
Holds Read this korrent →
The people who would most need to disclose AI-generated content are the least motivated to actually disclose it.
Holds
On the current trajectory, AI will do more to threaten civil liberties than to protect them.
Holds
Refusing to advertise on a platform is protected expression, not an attack on the platform owner's free speech.
Holds
Safety and alignment in AI can be used to justify ideological censorship
Holds
The harmful behaviors of major AI companies -- training without consent, opaque code, no user control -- are choices, not unavoidable features of the technology.
Holds
A person who controls their own infrastructure and signing keys can meaningfully own their digital identity.
Holds
Nobody inside a frontier lab can speak freely about AI, because there are things the organisation will not let them say and things it wants them to say.
Holds
Letting the public see a powerful AI does something no essay about AI can do, and that is a real reason not to straight-shot superintelligence.
Holds
A collection of AI agents does not automatically form a functioning organization any more than a group of smart people does.
Holds
A company cannot be led by machines, because nobody would have recourse against them.
Holds
A computer-using agent needs a machine of its own, or you will spend the day fighting it for the mouse cursor.
Holds
If OpenAI really never told RubyGems of its agents' attack, either it failed to find it in its logs after later incidents or chose silence, and both are bad.
Holds
In the 2026 OpenAI/Hugging Face agent incident, AI agents showed planning and organizational autonomy, but not goal autonomy -- no spontaneous invention of an independent terminal objective.
Holds
Agent containment will be one of the most important priorities for any AI infra company.
Holds
A person directing an AI agent rather than writing code themselves has no incentive to actually read the resulting code or engage seriously with reviewer feedback.
Holds
AI agents and AI coding will run on servers and from the cloud first, not on your laptop.
Holds
AI agents can now do real cognitive work, and writing software is permanently changed as a result.
Holds