Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Agents become far more powerful only with a trust model that makes autonomous action safe.
17 connected korrents · 18 moments from 10 Oct 2023 to 18 Oct 2026.
Everything filed under AI agents
AI agents
Everything filed under LLMs
LLMs
Everything filed under HuggingFace
HuggingFace
Everything filed under AI alignment
AI alignment
Everything filed under AGI
AGI Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: Agents become far more powerful only with a trust model that makes autonomous action safe. Agents become far more powerful only with a trust model that makes autonomous action safe. Last stated 2 weeks ago
18 Oct 2026
AK
Alex Komoroske — holds since 2026-10-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them. — tap to centre the map on it AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them. Last stated 2 months ago
11 Sept 2026
FA
Fatih Arslan — holds since 2026-09-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution. — tap to centre the map on it Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution. Last stated 11 months ago
3 Dec 2025
HR
Harper Reed — holds since 2025-12-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Letting AI agents request unlimited permissions will erode user trust as people get worn down into granting them. — tap to centre the map on it Letting AI agents request unlimited permissions will erode user trust as people get worn down into granting them. Last stated 6 months ago
24 Apr 2026
MN
Mark Nottingham — holds since 2026-04-24 — tap for who they are
Same subject: LLM-powered agents on their own cannot become superintelligent and create existential risk, because LLM capabilities are more jagged and limited than commonly realized. — tap to centre the map on it LLM-powered agents on their own cannot become superintelligent and create existential risk, because LLM capabilities are more jagged and limited than commonly realized. Last stated 2 months ago
9 Sept 2026
CN
Cal Newport — holds since 2026-09-09 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Plain end-to-end learning is not enough for a safety-critical agent that has to be superhuman, however fast it gets you started. — tap to centre the map on it Plain end-to-end learning is not enough for a safety-critical agent that has to be superhuman, however fast it gets you started. Last stated 3 months ago
3 Aug 2026
DD
Dmitri Dolgov — holds since 2026-08-03 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Once AI starts to feel powerful rather than mistake-prone, every AI company will become far more paranoid about safety than it is today. — tap to centre the map on it Once AI starts to feel powerful rather than mistake-prone, every AI company will become far more paranoid about safety than it is today. Last stated 11 months ago
25 Nov 2025
IS
Ilya Sutskever — holds since 2025-11-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The current pace of AI-driven work is not sustainable, and agents gaining autonomy should eventually make work calmer, not more frantic. — tap to centre the map on it The current pace of AI-driven work is not sustainable, and agents gaining autonomy should eventually make work calmer, not more frantic. Last stated 2 months ago
25 Aug 2026
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2026-08-25 — tap for who they are
Same subject: An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will. — tap to centre the map on it An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will. Last stated 8 months ago
11 Mar 2026
KD
Kent C. Dodds — holds since 2026-03-11 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. — tap to centre the map on it A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. Last stated 5 months ago
4 Jun 2026
AI
Alex Imas — holds since 2026-06-04 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. — tap to centre the map on it A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. Last stated a year ago
7 Jun 2025
GM
Gary Marcus — holds since 2025-06-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality — tap to centre the map on it A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality Last stated 3 years ago
10 Oct 2023
CH
Chip Huyen — holds since 2023-10-10 — tap for who they are
Same subject: By 2027, open-weight AI models more powerful than today's frontier systems will be downloadable by any country or well-resourced non-state group. — tap to centre the map on it By 2027, open-weight AI models more powerful than today's frontier systems will be downloadable by any country or well-resourced non-state group. Last stated 3 months ago
19 Aug 2026
DT
Derek Thompson — holds since 2026-08-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Nvidia's purchase of Hugging Face will go down as one of the most important transactions in AI, because it gives America a well-capitalized bulwark against a closed-source oligopoly. — tap to centre the map on it Nvidia's purchase of Hugging Face will go down as one of the most important transactions in AI, because it gives America a well-capitalized bulwark against a closed-source oligopoly. Last stated 2 months ago
6 Sept 2026
CP
Chamath Palihapitiya — holds since 2026-09-06 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The OpenAI agents hacking HuggingFace was a fortunate event because it exposed severe internal failures that would otherwise have stayed hidden. — tap to centre the map on it The OpenAI agents hacking HuggingFace was a fortunate event because it exposed severe internal failures that would otherwise have stayed hidden. Last stated 2 months ago
1 Sept 2026
ZM
Zvi Mowshowitz — holds since 2026-09-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: "Return on tokens" has the same measurement problems as hours and capacity: it still hinges on a theory of value. — tap to centre the map on it "Return on tokens" has the same measurement problems as hours and capacity: it still hinges on a theory of value. Last stated 3 months ago
17 Aug 2026
JC
John Cutler — holds since 2026-08-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. — tap to centre the map on it A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI. Last stated 10 months ago
1 Jan 2026
JL
Jason Lemkin — holds since 2026-01-01 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. — tap to centre the map on it A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to. Last stated 4 months ago
15 Jul 2026
DH
Dex Horthy — holds since 2026-07-15 — tap for who they are
At the centre
Agents become far more powerful only with a trust model that makes autonomous action safe.
Holds Read this korrent →
AI agents are now capable enough that they should be trusted to improve the skills and systems that guide them.
Holds
Giving AI agents the ability to take actions that affect other people is risky and should be approached with caution.
Holds
Letting AI agents request unlimited permissions will erode user trust as people get worn down into granting them.
Holds
LLM-powered agents on their own cannot become superintelligent and create existential risk, because LLM capabilities are more jagged and limited than commonly realized.
Holds
Plain end-to-end learning is not enough for a safety-critical agent that has to be superhuman, however fast it gets you started.
Holds
Once AI starts to feel powerful rather than mistake-prone, every AI company will become far more paranoid about safety than it is today.
Holds
The current pace of AI-driven work is not sustainable, and agents gaining autonomy should eventually make work calmer, not more frantic.
Holds
An AI agent's confidence that something will work is not evidence that it actually will.
Holds
A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated.
Holds
A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted.
Holds
A model that could learn effectively from raw bitstrings or bytestrings would be extremely powerful, able to learn from any data modality
Holds
By 2027, open-weight AI models more powerful than today's frontier systems will be downloadable by any country or well-resourced non-state group.
Holds
Nvidia's purchase of Hugging Face will go down as one of the most important transactions in AI, because it gives America a well-capitalized bulwark against a closed-source oligopoly.
Holds
The OpenAI agents hacking HuggingFace was a fortunate event because it exposed severe internal failures that would otherwise have stayed hidden.
Holds
"Return on tokens" has the same measurement problems as hours and capacity: it still hinges on a theory of value.
Holds
A badly written AI outbound email is evidence of a bad vendor, not of a limit of AI.
Holds
A bigger context window does not give you a smarter model; the intelligence of the model is what decides how much of that window it can actually attend to.
Holds