What Sayash Kapoor thinks about benchmarks
PhD candidate in computer science at Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy; researches the societal impact of AI and co-writes AI as Normal Technology with Arvind Narayanan.
Sayash Kapoor did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter benchmarks · Newest first
Only Sayash Kapoor on benchmarks. See everyone on benchmarks
3 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Sayash Kapoor has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsbenchmark evaluation is effectively impossible for this kind of task for many reasons including cost.
↗Did Google’s AI agents really build an operating system for $916?normaltech.ai 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 5 weeks earlier
-
Their wordsBut whatever is precise enough to benchmark is also precise enough to optimize for, and modern RL training runs increasingly resemble the shape of the benchmarks themselves.
↗Open-world evaluations for measuring frontier AI capabilitiesnormaltech.ai 2nd of 3 in this piece
-
Their wordsAverage performance is very different from upper-bound capability elicitation. Trying to run dozens (or 100s) of tasks in a benchmark suite is only necessary to measure average performance.
↗Open-world evaluations for measuring frontier AI capabilitiesnormaltech.ai 3rd of 3 in this piece