What Rohit Krishnan thinks about peer review

@rohit-krishnan · 24 positions · On ppll ↗

Writes Strange Loop Canon, on the intersection of technology, economics and business.

Rohit Krishnan did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

Filter peer review · Newest first

Topic

All 24 peer review 1 AI agents 7 AI alignment 7 LLMs 5 behavioural science 3 design 2 AGI 1 benchmarks 1 capitalism 1

5 more topics

cybersecurity 1 government 1 ideas vs execution 1 market efficiency 1 metascience 1

Sort

Newest Oldest

Only Rohit Krishnan on peer review. See everyone on peer review

1 dated position, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Rohit Krishnan has said — not written or endorsed by them.

1 position so far — this page is not yet offered to search engines.

15 Jun 2026

Our readingCombining multiple AI models' outputs into one final answer tends to discard most of the good ideas that only one model produced.

Their wordsthe council does not simply keep the best bits from everyone. It keeps a minority of the good ideas, while peer review seems to give consensus ideas an extra push.

↗LLM councils show groupthinkstrangeloopcanon.com 2nd of 3 in this piece