What Philip Koopman thinks about behavioural science
Professor at Carnegie Mellon University who works on self-driving car safety and dependable embedded systems, principal technical contributor to the ANSI/UL 4600 autonomous-vehicle safety standard and author of How Safe Is Safe Enough? He writes the Safe Autonomy blog, which is largely an argument that the industry's public safety claims do not survive contact with the statistics.
Philip Koopman did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter behavioural science · Newest first
Only Philip Koopman on behavioural science. See everyone on behavioural science
1 dated position, 2023, in their own words. Our reading of what Philip Koopman has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordssuggests that any steering automation safety gains (e.g., Level 2 autopilot) are approximately negated by driver complacency, with autopilot on being slightly worse than autopilot off
↗Take Tesla safety claims with about a pound of saltsafeautonomy.blogspot.com 1st of 2 in this piece