Neha Narula
Computer scientist and director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative; her research covers distributed systems, databases and digital currency.
Neha Narula did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter All topics · Newest first
Topic
-
Our reading
Stripe has always been about capturing the wide swath of new companies, not Fortune 500 enterprises
Their wordsThis is a good analysis on the Stripe and OpenRouter acquisition! But I disagree with the Fortune 500 stuff at the end. Stripe has always been about capturing the wide swath of new companies, of which a few might grow to be Fortune 500s.
- 5 weeks earlier
-
Their wordsThe original sin was the belief (propagated by certain VCs) that money and finance weren't "enough" and blockchain technology had to expand to replace the entire internet. this made no sense and totally diluted the use case. fixing money and finance is the whole point
- 3 months earlier
-
Their wordstl;dr: we should work towards activating a PQ-safe output type with PQ signatures now. everything else (including escape hatches, zk proofs, commit/reveal, to freeze or not) can, and should, wait.
- 7 days earlier
-
Their wordsa stablecoin is in no way a bearer instrument ownership records are kept in a smart contract completely controlled by the issuer i'm not sure where this idea came from, but it's not helpful when thinking about regulation or responsibility.
- 10 days earlier
-
Their wordstl;dr: I think the risk is high enough to warrant prioritizing designing, implementing, and evaluating post-quantum signature schemes and consensus upgrades in Bitcoin now.