What Neel Nanda thinks about AGI

@neel-nanda · 17 positions · On ppll ↗

Runs the mechanistic interpretability team at Google DeepMind; worked on interpretability at Anthropic before that.

Neel Nanda did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

Filter AGI · Newest first

Topic

All 17 ambition 3 behavioural science 2 AGI 1 benchmarks 1 education 1 hiring 1 management 1 mathematics 1 motivation 1

4 more topics

neural networks 1 Psychotherapy 1 simplicity 1 taste 1

Sort

Newest Oldest

Only Neel Nanda on AGI. See everyone on AGI

1 dated position, 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Neel Nanda has said — not written or endorsed by them.

1 position so far — this page is not yet offered to search engines.

22 Mar 2025

Our readingA strong track record in a technical field is only weak evidence that someone has good strategic judgment about AGI.

Their wordsHaving a good research track record is some evidence of good big-picture takes about AGI, but it's weak evidence.

↗Post 50: Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Good Strategic Takesneelnanda.io 1st of 2 in this piece