What Matthew Yglesias thinks about AI alignment
Writes Slow Boring, a near-daily newsletter on American politics and public policy; co-founded Vox in 2014 and left it in 2020.
Matthew Yglesias did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter AI alignment · Newest first
Only Matthew Yglesias on AI alignment. See everyone on AI alignment
3 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Matthew Yglesias has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Our readingThere is now broad agreement within AI safety circles that fully open AI development is undesirable.
Their wordsI think it's now pretty widely agreed in safety circles that total openness is in fact not desirable.
↗A simple plan to save the world from rogue A.I.slowboring.com 1st of 3 in this piece
-
Their wordsOnly a safe, well-aligned superintelligence developed in the world of liberal democracies could entrench liberal-democratic values.
↗A simple plan to save the world from rogue A.I.slowboring.com 2nd of 3 in this piece
- 4 days earlier
-
Their wordsFrom an investment viewpoint, the opposite of the safetyist view is "it's all a bubble," not "A.I. is going to be really good."
↗The economy could survive a downtick in A.I.slowboring.com 2nd of 2 in this piece