What Kenton Lee thinks about LLMs
One of the four authors of the 2018 paper "BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding", at Google AI Language, the affiliation printed on the paper.
Kenton Lee did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter LLMs · Newest first
Only Kenton Lee on LLMs. See everyone on LLMs
3 dated positions, 2018, in their own words. Our reading of what Kenton Lee has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsWe argue that current techniques restrict the power of the pre-trained representations, especially for the fine-tuning approaches. The major limitation is that standard language models are unidirectional, and this limits the choice of architectures that can be used during pre-training.
↗BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingarxiv.org All 16 from this paper
-
Their wordsSuch restrictions are sub-optimal for sentence-level tasks, and could be very harmful when applying fine-tuning based approaches to token-level tasks such as question answering, where it is crucial to incorporate context from both directions.
↗BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingarxiv.org All 16 from this paper
-
Their wordsIntuitively, it is reasonable to believe that a deep bidirectional model is strictly more powerful than either a left-to-right model or the shallow concatenation of a left-to-right and a right-to-left model.
↗BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingarxiv.org All 16 from this paper