What Kate Shaw thinks about government
American legal scholar, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, co-host of the Strict Scrutiny podcast and a contributing opinion writer for The New York Times; earlier a law clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens and an associate counsel in the Obama White House.
Kate Shaw did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter government · Newest first
Only Kate Shaw on government. See everyone on government
5 dated positions, 2025 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Kate Shaw has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsI’ve got a piece in the @nytimes.com this morning about yesterday’s decision in Slaughter - and also about how any post-Trump response *must* include Supreme Court reform
- 10 months earlier
-
Their wordsThere’s so much more to say about SCOTUS, but one thing I hope came through in this convo is what a winning streak Trump is on at SCOTUS right now - & how insane it is that the court is blessing many of his assertions of executive authority w/o a word of explanation
- 2 months earlier
-
Their wordsSCOTUS majority not deigning to give *any* reasons for staying the injunction of the district court - in the highest-possible stakes context & where the executive branch has acted appallingly - evincing real contempt for both district courts & the rule of law
- 4 weeks earlier
-
Their wordsI’ve got a piece in the @nytimes.com this morning on the Supreme Court’s quiet but radical shadow-docket order last week handing Trump yet another tool to eliminate independent expertise & authority and consolidate presidential control over the executive branch
- 2 months earlier
-
Their wordsthe latest EO targeting Jenner & Block should convince any wavering firms that commitment to the rule of law & interest in self-preservation run in the same direction here - they have to challenge these orders