What Kate Shaw thinks about democracy
American legal scholar, professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, co-host of the Strict Scrutiny podcast and a contributing opinion writer for The New York Times; earlier a law clerk to Justice John Paul Stevens and an associate counsel in the Obama White House.
Kate Shaw did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter democracy · Newest first
Only Kate Shaw on democracy. See everyone on democracy
2 dated positions, 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Kate Shaw has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsSCOTUS majority not deigning to give *any* reasons for staying the injunction of the district court - in the highest-possible stakes context & where the executive branch has acted appallingly - evincing real contempt for both district courts & the rule of law
- 5 months earlier
-
Their wordsIt’s true that most of what’s in this report is familiar. But it’s still such an important document to have out in the world - in particular in light of efforts, of which we’re likely to see more, to rewrite the history of January 6