korrents

What Hillel Wayne thinks about mathematics

@hillel-wayne · 45 positions · 0 changes of mind

Writer and consultant on formal methods, testing and software correctness, author of Logic for Programmers and Practical TLA+. He ran the Crossover Project, interviewing seventeen people who worked as traditional engineers before becoming software developers, to settle by evidence whether software engineering is engineering.

Everything they publish, on ppll ↗

Hillel Wayne did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

3 dated positions, 2021 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Hillel Wayne has said — not written or endorsed by them.

3 positions so far — this page is not yet offered to search engines.

  1. But I think it is more useful for most developers to have an exposure to like what math has in the various fields versus just going all in every single field when they see them, right? You've got to know what's available to know what's most useful for you. And most math will not be useful for you.

    Formal methods with Hillel Wayneyoutube.com 13th of 24 in this recording

  2. And I wonder sometimes if that is the reason people don't recognize the use of math in software engineering is because the math they do need is not the math they've been exposed to.

    Formal methods with Hillel Wayneyoutube.com 14th of 24 in this recording

  3. 6 years earlier
  4. Just because we use a different branch of math doesn't mean we're not doing engineering.

    Are We Really Engineers?hillelwayne.com 2nd of 6 in this piece