What Elisabeth Bik thinks about peer review
Dutch-American microbiologist and science integrity consultant who finds image duplication and manipulation in published research. Worked at Stanford University from 2001 to 2016; working on research integrity full time since 2019. Won the John Maddox Prize in 2021. Writes Science Integrity Digest.
Elisabeth Bik did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter peer review · Newest first
Only Elisabeth Bik on peer review. See everyone on peer review
3 dated positions, 2025 to 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Elisabeth Bik has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsUnfortunately, many of these problematic papers are still not addressed by the journals now, ten years later, even though the concerns in some of them are far beyond what could be blamed on an innocent error.
↗Skip to contentscienceintegritydigest.com 1st of 3 in this piece
-
Their wordsCytokine has been one of the journals that did very little with the 30 papers I reported to them in October 2015. Of those papers, only 2 have been retracted, and another 2 have been corrected. The remaining 26 (87%!) have not been touched.
↗Skip to contentscienceintegritydigest.com 3rd of 3 in this piece
- 14 months earlier
-
Their wordsIt anonymously tries to smear the reputation of PubPeer commenters, by making all kinds of false accusations.
↗Skip to contentscienceintegritydigest.com 2nd of 3 in this piece