What Anton Howes thinks about peer review
Historian of innovation, writing the newsletter Age of Invention on the causes of the British Industrial Revolution and on how inventions actually came about.
Anton Howes did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
Filter peer review · Newest first
Only Anton Howes on peer review. See everyone on peer review
2 dated positions, 2023 to 2025, in their own words. Our reading of what Anton Howes has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsOver the past few decades, journal editors and peer-reviewers have increasingly insisted that papers must present large datasets that have been treated using complex statistical methods in order to make even the mildest claims about what caused what.
- 2 years earlier
-
Their wordsBut I’ve become increasingly worried that science’s replication crises might pale in comparison to what happens all the time in history, which is not just a replication crisis but a reproducibility crisis.
↗Age of Invention: Does History have a Replication Crisis?ageofinvention.xyz 1st of 4 in this piece