korrents

korrents · books

Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (Vintage, 2015 edition; first published in Hebrew 2011; translated by the author with John Purcell and Haim Watzman)

Yuval Noah Harari · c. 2011–2015

Read the book on books.google.com ↗

2 people recommend it, on rcmnd ↗

35 korrents from this book ↓

Yuval Noah Harari did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this book, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The book prints chapter headings its extracted text does not preserve, so the claims below are in the book's order but not grouped. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. But the best thing fire did was cook.

    See it on the page ↗

  2. Reliable information about who could be trusted meant that small bands could expand into larger bands, and Sapiens could develop tighter and more sophisticated types of cooperation.

    See it on the page ↗

  3. Most people can neither intimately know, nor gossip effectively about, more than 150 human beings.

    See it on the page ↗

  4. Even today, a critical threshold in human organisations falls somewhere around this magic number.

    See it on the page ↗

  5. The idea behind such companies is among humanity's most ingenious inventions.

    See it on the page ↗

  6. An imagined reality is not a lie.

    See it on the page ↗

  7. The difficulty lies not in telling the story, but in convincing everyone else to believe it.

    See it on the page ↗

  8. Consequently, ever since the Cognitive Revolution Homo sapiens has been able to revise its behaviour rapidly.

    See it on the page ↗

  9. We did not domesticate wheat. It domesticated us.

    See it on the page ↗

  10. The pursuit of an easier life resulted in much hardship, and not for the last time.

    See it on the page ↗

  11. But the Agricultural Revolution didn't need every band in a given region to join up. It only took one.

    See it on the page ↗

  12. We believe in a particular order not because it is objectively true, but because believing in it enables us to cooperate effectively and forge a better society.

    See it on the page ↗

  13. First, you never admit that the order is imagined.

    See it on the page ↗

  14. Even if by some superhuman effort I succeed in freeing my personal desires from the grip of the imagined order, I am just one person.

    See it on the page ↗

  15. These two inventions filled the gaps left by our biological inheritance.

    See it on the page ↗

  16. Biology is willing to tolerate a very wide spectrum of possibilities. It's culture that obliges people to realise some possibilities while forbidding others.

    See it on the page ↗

  17. In fact, no social animal is ever guided by the interests of the entire species to which it belongs.

    See it on the page ↗

  18. money is the most universal and most efficient system of mutual trust ever devised.

    See it on the page ↗

  19. Empires, too, ultimately fall, but they tend to leave behind rich and enduring legacies.

    See it on the page ↗

  20. The crucial historical role of religion has been to give superhuman legitimacy to these fragile structures.

    See it on the page ↗

  21. These creeds do not like to be called religions, and refer to themselves as ideologies. But this is just a semantic exercise.

    See it on the page ↗

  22. Religion is a system of human norms and values that is founded on belief in a superhuman order.

    See it on the page ↗

  23. Humanism has split into three rival sects that fight over the exact definition of 'humanity', just as rival Christian sects fought over the exact definition of God.

    See it on the page ↗

  24. Theist religions sanctify the gods. Humanist religions sanctify humanity, or more correctly, Homo sapiens.

    See it on the page ↗

  25. The idea that all humans are equal is a revamped version of the monotheist conviction that all souls are equal before God.

    See it on the page ↗

  26. Credit enables us to build the present at the expense of the future. It's founded on the assumption that our future resources are sure to be far more abundant than our present resources.

    See it on the page ↗

  27. Conversely, the history of capitalism is unintelligible without taking science into account.

    See it on the page ↗

  28. It cannot ensure that profits are gained in a fair way, or distributed in a fair manner. On the contrary, the craving to increase profits and production blinds people to anything that might stand in the way.

    See it on the page ↗

  29. Ecological degradation is not the same as resource scarcity.

    See it on the page ↗

  30. Markets and states today provide most of the material needs once provided by communities, but they must also supply tribal bonds.

    See it on the page ↗

  31. Throughout history empires have crushed rebellions with an iron fist, and when its day came, a sinking empire used all its might to save itself, usually collapsing into a bloodbath.

    See it on the page ↗

  32. When things improve, expectations balloon, and consequently even dramatic improvements in objective conditions can leave us dissatisfied.

    See it on the page ↗

  33. If happiness is based on feeling that life is meaningful, then in order to be happier we need to delude ourselves more effectively.

    See it on the page ↗

  34. Buddhism has assigned the question of happiness more importance than perhaps any other human creed.

    See it on the page ↗

  35. For these projects are inextricably meshed together with the Gilgamesh Project.

    See it on the page ↗

Related books

Found from what the books talk about: claims worded alike in the archive's hourly pass, and subjects both are filed under. It is not a judgement that they agree — related books often argue the opposite. All books

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.