Work produced by one frontier model should be reviewed by a different one, for the same reason a good programmer's work improves under a good peer's review.

Added to korrents 30 Aug 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Shared subject first, then similar wording. They may agree or disagree.

• Open-source models cannot keep frontier systems in check, because they will always be much dumber than the frontier. ACAjeya Cotra1 Sept 2026
• Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great. DHDex Horthy15 Jul 2026
• Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. CHChip Huyen29 Mar 2026
• Feeling you have a grip on AI by getting your skills in the right order and your review flow right is probably a lot of cope for the fact that the models are still inconsistent. BLBrian Lovin14 Apr 2026
• Combining multiple AI models' outputs into one final answer tends to discard most of the good ideas that only one model produced. RKRohit Krishnan15 Jun 2026

See this claim on the map