Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.

Added to korrents 15 Jul 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• The code today’s models and agents write is very hard to follow: you get better performance without knowing why, and no way to fix it when it breaks. ESElizabeth Stone19 Jul 2026similar wording
• In an agent-written codebase the agent-written tests are equally untrustworthy; manually using the product is the only reliable measure of whether it works. MZMario Zechner25 Mar 2026similar wording
• Whether agent-written code needs to be good depends entirely on how long it will live: a throwaway single-page tool can be spaghetti, anything maintained cannot. SWSimon Willison19 Mar 2026similar wording
• Work produced by one frontier model should be reviewed by a different one, for the same reason a good programmer's work improves under a good peer's review. DHDavid Heinemeier Hansson26 Aug 2026similar wording
• Line-by-line code review has become an outdated ritual: senior engineers should be giving feedback on how their team instructs AI, not on the code AI wrote. CHChip Huyen29 Mar 2026similar wording

See this on the map →