korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

Whether a robot policy is any good is settled by running it for thirteen hours straight, not by whether it completes the task once.

Drawn from what Chelsea Finn said

robotics
What this subject means

robotics Machines that act in the world: humanoids, training data for robots, and how far behind language models they run.

A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Chelsea Finn actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Chelsea Finn

    Assistant professor of computer science at Stanford

    kind of going back to this reliability question, we took this policy and we ran it not just once, but we ran it for 13 hours straight. Uh and we basically wanted to evaluate is this policy not only good at making a latte once, but can it do so reliably to the extent that it would be needed to be useful in the real world?

Added to korrents 12 Aug 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

On the map

Loading the map… or open it on its own page

Open the map on its own page →