The bulk of agent acceleration is accruing to senior programmers, because judging whether agent output can ship is what made them senior.

Added to korrents 5 Sept 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Where this collides

• Cannot both be true

  Being an excellent programmer is a burden rather than an advantage when learning to work with coding agents.

  Hansson says the gains accrue to senior programmers, because judging whether output can ship is what made them senior. Fridman says being an excellent programmer is a burden rather than an advantage when learning to work with coding agents. The same expertise is the asset in one account and the obstacle in the other.

Shared subject first, then similar wording. They may agree or disagree.

• Agents will eventually stop making the mistakes that require senior review, as self-driving cars did; the bet is on when, not whether. DHDavid Heinemeier Hansson8 Apr 2026
• A swarm of agents with the right loop and the right metric can already out-produce a team of a hundred engineers. AWAlexandr Wang29 Jul 2026
• The very large productivity gains from agents require working with them directly; putting another human in between is too slow to preserve the gain. DHDavid Heinemeier Hansson26 Aug 2026
• Agents will have an insatiable thirst for signals about product quality, which most people today cannot aggregate. PCPatrick Collison9 Oct 2026
• Nobody in the coding-agent market is using AI so much better than everyone else that their competitors cannot keep up — the gap you would expect to see simply is not there. DRDax Raad27 May 2026

On the map

Open the map on its own page