korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

Some goods really will get a fully automated supply chain, and yet what that does to the overall capital share is genuinely ambiguous.

Drawn from what Phil Trammell said

A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Phil Trammell actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Phil Trammell

    Economist working on the economics of transformative AI

    I do think there's this qualitative shift that we I think we agree is coming, which is that there will be at least some goods whose network-adjusted capital share goes to one, right? Because the whole supply chain can be automated and there's no part in it that we care intrinsically about having a human do. Um, so that'll be a, you know, that'll be a qualitative shift. Interestingly, the implications of that shift for the overall capital share are ambiguous

Added to korrents 4 Jun 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

See this on the map →