Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← Permissive licences are the better way to release free software and free content, because they maximise adoption.
16 connected korrents · 11 moments on record from 14 Mar 2019 to 16 Nov 2025.
Everything filed under open source
open source
Everything filed under Hyprland
Hyprland
Everything filed under Linux
Linux
Everything filed under Arch Linux
Arch Linux Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Read this korrent: Permissive licences are the better way to release free software and free content, because they maximise adoption. Permissive licences are the better way to release free software and free content, because they maximise adoption. Last stated a year ago
7 Jul 2025
VB
Vitalik Buterin — no longer holds since 2025-07-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities. — tap to centre the map on it New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities. Last stated 7 years ago
14 Mar 2019
NA
Nadia Asparouhova — holds since 2019-03-14 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Copyleft licences impose obligations rather than restrictions, and it is from those obligations on the powerful that software freedom comes. — tap to centre the map on it Copyleft licences impose obligations rather than restrictions, and it is from those obligations on the powerful that software freedom comes. Last stated 2 years ago
19 Apr 2024
DD
Drew DeVault — holds since 2024-04-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay. — tap to centre the map on it Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay. Last stated 10 months ago
16 Nov 2025
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2025-11-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: No free or open source licence may restrict what the software is used for, however objectionable the use. — tap to centre the map on it No free or open source licence may restrict what the software is used for, however objectionable the use. Last stated 2 years ago
19 Apr 2024
DD
Drew DeVault — holds since 2024-04-19 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A company that will not accept a project’s terms is free to go and use a more permissive project instead. — tap to centre the map on it A company that will not accept a project’s terms is free to go and use a more permissive project instead. Last stated 2 years ago
26 Sept 2024
MM
Matt Mullenweg — holds since 2024-09-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The same absence of contracts and lawyers that let companies adopt open source freely is what let experts publish it, and raising the bar would break both. — tap to centre the map on it The same absence of contracts and lawyers that let companies adopt open source freely is what let experts publish it, and raising the bar would break both. Last stated 10 months ago
16 Nov 2025
TD
Thomas Depierre — holds since 2025-11-16 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A licence is only the floor of open source; what keeps a project alive is an ethos of contribution that no licence can compel. — tap to centre the map on it A licence is only the floor of open source; what keeps a project alive is an ethos of contribution that no licence can compel. Last stated 2 years ago
17 Sept 2024
MM
Matt Mullenweg — holds since 2024-09-17 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Free software is meant to be exploited commercially, and the licence’s terms are the whole of what a company owes in return. — tap to centre the map on it Free software is meant to be exploited commercially, and the licence’s terms are the whole of what a company owes in return. Last stated 5 years ago
18 Dec 2021
DD
Drew DeVault — holds since 2021-12-18 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu. — tap to centre the map on it Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu. Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own. — tap to centre the map on it Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own. Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for. — tap to centre the map on it Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for. Last stated a year ago
5 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft. — tap to centre the map on it A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft. Last stated a year ago
26 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation. — tap to centre the map on it Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation. Last stated a year ago
26 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of. — tap to centre the map on it Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of. Last stated a year ago
5 Aug 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-08-05 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult. — tap to centre the map on it Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult. Last stated a year ago
26 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-26 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring. — tap to centre the map on it Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring. Last stated a year ago
2 Jun 2025
DH
David Heinemeier Hansson — holds since 2025-06-02 — tap for who they are
At the centre
Permissive licences are the better way to release free software and free content, because they maximise adoption.
No longer holds VB Vitalik ButerinRead this korrent →
New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities.
Holds NA Nadia Asparouhova
Copyleft licences impose obligations rather than restrictions, and it is from those obligations on the powerful that software freedom comes.
Holds DD Drew DeVault
Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay.
Holds TD Thomas Depierre
No free or open source licence may restrict what the software is used for, however objectionable the use.
Holds DD Drew DeVault
A company that will not accept a project’s terms is free to go and use a more permissive project instead.
Holds MM Matt Mullenweg
The same absence of contracts and lawyers that let companies adopt open source freely is what let experts publish it, and raising the bar would break both.
Holds TD Thomas Depierre
A licence is only the floor of open source; what keeps a project alive is an ethos of contribution that no licence can compel.
Holds MM Matt Mullenweg
Free software is meant to be exploited commercially, and the licence’s terms are the whole of what a company owes in return.
Holds DD Drew DeVault
Arch's community package repository removes the manual scripting that a developer's setup still needs on Ubuntu.
Holds
Needing a choice and a config file for every last detail is both the cost of Arch with Hyprland and the reason it can be made entirely your own.
Holds
Hyprland put a twenty-year-old distribution in front of people who never believed open source could deliver a desktop worth leaving Windows or macOS for.
Holds
A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft.
Holds
Desktop Linux improved dramatically while Apple's users were not watching, and is now far more polished and capable than its reputation.
Holds
Desktop Linux is not for everyone, because plenty of people want a computer appliance they never have to look under the hood of.
Holds
Hyprland is hard because it ships with nothing, not because tiling window management is difficult.
Holds
Setting up Hyprland from scratch costs at least ten hours of installing and configuring.
Holds