Charging large companies for a licence sends them back through procurement, so they drift to a worse free alternative rather than pay.

Added to korrents 16 Nov 2025 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• Open source won because it let companies bypass procurement, legal review and contracts, not because it was free of charge. TDThomas Depierre16 Nov 2025similar wording
• New licences are the wrong lever for paying maintainers: copyleft’s history shows terms companies ignore, and relicensing attempts get beaten back by their own communities. NANadia Asparouhova14 Mar 2019similar wording
• If a company wants a maintainer to work to its standards, it has to start paying them under a different licence first. TDThomas Depierre31 Dec 2022similar wording
• Companies are willing to pay for their critical open source dependencies; what is missing is a legible way for projects to sell it to them. FVFilippo Valsorda8 Jul 2024similar wording
• Free software is meant to be exploited commercially, and the licence’s terms are the whole of what a company owes in return. DDDrew DeVault18 Dec 2021similar wording

On the map

Open the map on its own page →