17 connected korrents · 16 moments from 1 Feb 1996 to 8 Oct 2026. Nearly all of them are about software quality.
At the centre
Apple has more reason to stumble now than ever: terribly behind on AI, faltering software quality, rivals catching up on silicon, and a leadership too old to relearn.
Last stated 12 Jul 2025 · a year ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
Read this korrent →
-
Same subject: software quality
A language-agnostic conformance suite is the most powerful thing you can hand a coding agent, because the whole instruction becomes: write code until these tests pass.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Simon Willison
-
Same subject: software quality
A passing test suite is not evidence that the software works, so an agent must also be made to start the thing and exercise it the way a person would.
Last stated 19 Mar 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Simon Willison
-
Same subject: software quality
Adding a config option so nobody breaks compounds into permutations no test suite can cover, because it is infinitely harder to evolve software that has users.
Last stated 10 Aug 2026 · 2 months ago
Holds
Peter Steinberger
-
Same subject: software quality
Agentic code review raises the floor but cannot be trusted, because the model reading the code is the same model that wrote it, and it will tell you the code is great.
Last stated 15 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Dex Horthy
-
Same subject: software quality
Building on a model is unlike any previous software engineering, because the thing you are building on cannot be designed up front.
Last stated 27 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Boris Cherny
-
Same subject: software quality
Code quality is independent of whether it was written by a human or an AI.
Last stated 8 Oct 2026 · 2 weeks ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: software quality
Code quality still matters even as LLMs make writing code much faster
Last stated 13 May 2025 · a year ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: software quality
Code quality still matters even as LLMs make writing code much faster.
Last stated 10 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Fabien Sanglard
-
Same subject: Apple
A big switch to desktop Linux is coming, at least among developers, because there is enough dissatisfaction with both Apple and Microsoft.
Last stated 26 Jun 2025 · a year ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: Apple
A company can change fundamentally with new leadership
Last stated 5 Mar 2024 · 3 years ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: Apple
A company can lead its industry on values like privacy and user respect without actually excelling at them
Last stated 1 Apr 2026 · 7 months ago
Holds
Marco Arment
-
Same subject: code generation
A model can now port essentially any codebase from one programming language to another, work that used to take a team over a year.
Last stated 27 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
Boris Cherny
-
Same subject: code generation
Agents are the new compilers that compile intent into fast software.
Last stated 12 Sept 2026 · a month ago
Holds
Guillermo Rauch
-
Same subject: code generation
AI acceleration threatens 'less software': without the constraint of scarce hours, even 37signals will likely build too much.
Last stated 26 Jul 2026 · 3 months ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: Microsoft
Apple is repeating Microsoft's monopoly mistakes
Last stated 17 Jan 2024 · 3 years ago
Holds
David Heinemeier Hansson
-
Same subject: Microsoft
Social and advertising businesses come and go; a technology company that wants to endure has to build hardware.
Last stated 29 Jun 2023 · 3 years ago
Holds
George Hotz
-
Same subject: Microsoft
The desktop computer industry had stopped innovating, with Microsoft dominating, and had entered a dark age.
Last stated 1 Feb 1996 · 31 years ago
Holds
Steve Jobs