AGI worth the name would combine human adaptiveness with machine reliability, not reproduce human performance including human failures.

Added to korrents 7 Jun 2025 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Where this collides

• Cannot both be true

  Asked when an AI could build a billion-dollar business on its own: AGI has already arrived.

  Huang, asked when an AI could build a billion-dollar business on its own, answers that AGI has already arrived. Marcus says AGI worth the name would combine human adaptiveness with machine reliability rather than reproduce human performance on tests. By that definition the thing Huang says has arrived has not been built.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

• A country outside the AI supply chain should just buy the index — which works only in the world where AI ends up commoditised rather than concentrated. AIAlex Imas4 Jun 2026AGI
• A human being is not an AGI: we lack a huge amount of knowledge and rely on continual learning instead, so continual learning is what superintelligence should mean. ISIlya Sutskever25 Nov 2025AGI
• A language model is no substitute for a well-specified conventional algorithm, so it cannot simply be dropped into a complex problem and trusted. GMGary Marcus7 Jun 2025AGI
• A poor country should prioritise owning a piece of AI over retraining its workers, but it should not bet everything on that. PTPhil Trammell4 Jun 2026AGI
• AGI is not a finish line to be crossed but a smear with width, and we are already standing on it. PGPaul Graham3 Sept 2026AGI

See this on the map →