korrents

Our readingWhat is a korrent?

A threat loses First Amendment protection only if the speaker was at least reckless about it being taken as a threat.

Drawn from what Ken White said

What these subjects mean

government What states are for and what they are worse at than markets and networks: legitimacy, moral hazard, and who may be entrusted with power.

censorship Who gets to remove what: speech, code and money, and whether a state prosecuting a platform is regulation or something else.

What Ken White actually said

  1. Ken White Criminal defence and First Amendment lawyer in Los Angeles
    Now, finally, the Court has resolved the question: the First Amendment requires that, at a minimum, the government prove that a speaker was reckless about whether their statement would be interpreted as threatening.

Added to korrents 7 Sept 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

I hold this too

Related korrents

Shared subject first, then similar wording. They may agree or disagree.

See this claim on the map