korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

A threat loses First Amendment protection only if the speaker was at least reckless about it being taken as a threat.

Drawn from what Ken White said

Subjectgovernment
What this subject means

government What states are for and what they are worse at than markets and networks: legitimacy, moral hazard, and who may be entrusted with power.

Interesting
A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Ken White actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Ken White

    Criminal defence and First Amendment lawyer in Los Angeles

    Now, finally, the Court has resolved the question: the First Amendment requires that, at a minimum, the government prove that a speaker was reckless about whether their statement would be interpreted as threatening.

    Where this was said

    ↗Supreme Court Clarifies "True Threats" First Amendment Exceptionpopehat.substack.com

    All 2 korrents from this piecethis one is 2nd

Added to korrents 27 Jun 2023 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

On the map

Loading the map… or open it on its own page

Open the map on its own page →