A team can stop reading the code it ships, but only by first working out how its agents are to prove that what they wrote actually works.

Added to korrents 7 Sept 2026 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Shared subject first, then similar wording. They may agree or disagree.

• Agent-written code that runs and passes its tests is not enough: security, maintainability and being able to roll it back still need humans in the loop. TFTony Fadell7 Jun 2026
• Unlike code, an agent's knowledge work cannot be judged by its output alone; the process, inputs and reasoning have to be examined too. TSTara Seshan30 Aug 2026
• In an agent-written codebase the agent-written tests are equally untrustworthy; manually using the product is the only reliable measure of whether it works. MZMario Zechner25 Mar 2026
• There is no point arguing about whether or when engineers will ship code they have not read; the only useful question is what it would take. CMCharity Majors12 Aug 2026
• A person directing an AI agent rather than writing code themselves has no incentive to actually read the resulting code or engage seriously with reviewer feedback. DCDavid Crawshaw7 May 2026

See this claim on the map