korrents

What Vitalik Buterin thinks about cryptography

@vitalik-buterin · 6 positions · 1 change of mind

Co-founder of Ethereum. Publishes long essays on mechanism design, governance and what cryptography is for, and returns to his earlier positions to say which parts he no longer holds.

Everything they publish, on ppll ↗

Vitalik Buterin did not write this page.

We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.

6 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Vitalik Buterin has said — not written or endorsed by them.

  1. This is a wild and risky bet; it sits on a graveyard of failed attempts at white-box cryptography .

    Obfuscation (Part III): Local Mixingvitalik.eth.limo

  2. A big-enough random reversible circuit is plausibly a secure cryptographic permutation, a big-enough random irreversible circuit degenerates into having only a few possible outputs.

    Obfuscation (Part III): Local Mixingvitalik.eth.limo

  3. But, so far, mixing has not proved to be good enough. There ended up being too many correlations between values in \(C\) and values in the obfuscation that remained.

    Obfuscation (Part III): Local Mixingvitalik.eth.limo

  4. 8 weeks earlier
  5. The most powerful primitive that has been conceived in cryptography is obfuscation

    Obfuscation: building the final boss of cryptography (Part I)vitalik.eth.limo

  6. it turns out that making a secure form of obfuscation is really really hard

    Obfuscation: building the final boss of cryptography (Part I)vitalik.eth.limo

  7. But within the good news, there is bad news: the run time is literally galactic

    Obfuscation: building the final boss of cryptography (Part I)vitalik.eth.limo