What Thorsten Ball thinks about coding agents
Co-founder of Amp and co-host of the Raising an Agent podcast. Wrote Writing an Interpreter in Go.
Everything they publish, on ppll ↗
Thorsten Ball did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
5 dated positions, 2026, in their own words. Our reading of what Thorsten Ball has said — not written or endorsed by them.
-
Their wordsif an entity can write a 1000 line program without ANY mistake and any compile error -- do you really think it needs the exact same crutches we do?
- 1 day earlier
-
Their wordsIf you believe that Rust isn't needed for agents anymore because they're good at mem alloc then you also have to believe aspects of testing become useless.
- 9 days earlier
-
Their wordsIncreasingly convinced: people who do best with agents are those that are good at shipping things in small pieces
-
Their wordsThese models are so much more now than text-to-code converters.
- 5 days earlier
-
Their words“Engineers” who act as “meat proxies” and shove tickets into agents and report back to humans will no longer be valuable.
↗What I believe about the future of software developmentthorstenball.com 9th of 15 in this piece