Eric Schwitzgebel
American philosopher and professor at the University of California, Riverside, who writes on philosophy of mind, moral psychology and AI and is the author of The Weirdness of the World.
Eric Schwitzgebel did not write this page.
We collected these quotes from things they published elsewhere, and every quote links to where it was said. They have no account here and have not endorsed this site. Quotes are word for word; the short line under each one is our own restatement, not their wording. Their own site. Is this you? Claim it or ask us to remove it. Or tell us what is wrong here.
-
Their wordsPhilosophy journals should also want human-generated rather than AI-generated text for the same evidential reasons.
↗AI Slop and Evidence about Evidence: Why Philosophy Journals Should Reject AI-Written Proseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 1st of 4 in this piece
-
Their wordsHuman experts think differently and better than LLMs.
↗AI Slop and Evidence about Evidence: Why Philosophy Journals Should Reject AI-Written Proseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 2nd of 4 in this piece
-
Our reading
There is a huge cognitive difference between approving a text one reads and actually generating it.
Their wordsThere's a huge cognitive difference between nodding along while reading something and actually productively generating a text.
↗AI Slop and Evidence about Evidence: Why Philosophy Journals Should Reject AI-Written Proseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 3rd of 4 in this piece
-
Their wordsThe fact that you, an expert human, generated the text is evidence that the view is worth thinking about -- more so than if the text were generated by an LLM.
↗AI Slop and Evidence about Evidence: Why Philosophy Journals Should Reject AI-Written Proseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 4th of 4 in this piece
- 5 weeks earlier
-
Their wordsBy canceling the 2+1 experiment, the APA once again deprioritized the interests of these groups.
↗Online Conferences Should be Better than In-Person Conferences, Not Worseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 1st of 2 in this piece
-
Their wordsI anticipate that eventually, if we give it a good enough try, online conferences will be better overall than in-person conferences, even if not better in every respect -- but only if enough of us try, long enough, and in different ways, with the evolving tools that companies will be inspired to build if we create the market for them.
↗Online Conferences Should be Better than In-Person Conferences, Not Worseschwitzsplinters.blogspot.com 2nd of 2 in this piece