For Taylor Swift, the Future of Music Is a Love Story (op-ed by Taylor Swift, The Wall Street Journal, 7 July 2014; full text as reposted to the Infowarrior mailing list)

Taylor Swift · 7 Jul 2014

Taylor Swift did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

Our reading
Music is valuable art and should not be free

Their wordsMusic is art, and art is important and rare. Important, rare things are valuable. Valuable things should be paid for. It's my opinion that music should not be free, and my prediction is that individual artists and their labels will someday decide what an album's price point is.
Our reading
Genre will become less of a career-defining path and more of an organisational tool

Their wordsI want to make music that reflects all of my influences, and I think that in the coming decades the idea of genres will become less of a career-defining path and more of an organizational tool.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.