korrents

korrents · books

Voltaire's Philosophical Dictionary (English selection, H. I. Woolf translation, 1924)

Voltaire · c. 1752–1774

Read the book on gutenberg.org ↗

20 korrents from this book ↓

Voltaire did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this book, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The book prints chapter headings its extracted text does not preserve, so the claims below are in the book's order but not grouped. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. It is indubitable that in a civilized town, it is infinitely more useful to have a religion, even a bad one, than to have none at all.
  2. Fanaticism is certainly a thousand times more deadly; for atheism inspires no bloody passion, whereas fanaticism does: atheism is not opposed to crime, but fanaticism causes crimes to be committed.
  3. It is therefore absolutely necessary for princes and for peoples, that the idea of a Supreme Being, creator, ruler, rewarder, revenger, shall be deeply engraved in people's minds.
  4. Popular government is in itself, therefore, less iniquitous, less abominable than despotic power.
  5. All men would then be necessarily equal, if they were without needs; the poverty connected with our species subordinates one man to another; it is not the inequality which is the real misfortune, it is the dependence.
  6. In our unhappy world it is impossible for men living in society not to be divided into two classes, the one the rich that commands, the other the poor that serves; and these two are subdivided into a thousand, and these thousand still have different gradations.
  7. Such then is the human state that to wish for one's country's greatness is to wish harm to one's neighbours.
  8. There is no good code in any country. The reason for this is evident; the laws have been made according to the times, the place and the need, etc.
  9. It seems to me that most men have received from nature enough common sense to make laws, but that everyone is not just enough to make good laws.
  10. It is, I think, the last degree of the malignity of our nature, to wish to oppress these very philosophers who would correct it.
  11. Prejudice is an opinion without judgment. Thus all over the world do people inspire children with all the opinions they desire, before the children can judge.
  12. When the truth is evident, it is impossible for parties and factions to arise.
  13. The superstitious man is to the rogue what the slave is to the tyrant.
  14. In a word, less superstition, less fanaticism; and less fanaticism, less misery.
  15. He believes that religion does not consist either in the opinions of an unintelligible metaphysic, or in vain display, but in worship and justice.
  16. What is tolerance? it is the consequence of humanity. We are all formed of frailty and error; let us pardon reciprocally each other's folly—that is the first law of nature.
  17. It is clear that the individual who persecutes a man, his brother, because he is not of the same opinion, is a monster.
  18. Of all religions, the Christian is without doubt the one which should inspire tolerance most, although up to now the Christians have been the most intolerant of all men.
  19. From generation to generation scepticism increases, and probability diminishes; and soon probability is reduced to zero.
  20. Under which tyranny would you like to live? Under neither; but if I had to choose, I should detest the tyranny of one man less than that of many.

Related books

Found from what the books talk about: claims worded alike in the archive's hourly pass, and subjects both are filed under. It is not a judgement that they agree — related books often argue the opposite. All books

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.