Read the piece on neelnanda.io ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
Being smart and competent makes someone right more often, but not right every time.
Mental modelProbabilistic thinking
Their wordsSomeone being smart and competent just means they're right more often, not that they're always right
Our reading
Mathematics gives practitioners corrective feedback on being wrong that moral philosophy lacks.
Their wordsMathematicians get feedback re whether there proofs work in a way that, as far as I can tell, moral philosophy doesn't
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.