korrents

korrents · Lex Fridman Podcast · #494

Jensen Huang: NVIDIA - The $4 Trillion Company & the AI Revolution | Lex Fridman Podcast #494

Jensen Huang · 2h 25m · youtube.com

22 korrents from this recording

1h2h
Jensen Huang did not write this page.

Every claim below is a statement made in this recording, quoted word for word and linked to the second it was said, so you can hear it rather than take our word for it. The wording comes from the transcript published alongside the recording; the sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording.

  1. 0:11:27 · watch on youtube.com

    The install base is the single most important part of a computing architecture, and everything else about it is secondary.

    They come to a computing platform because the install base is large. Because a developer, like anybody else, wants to develop software that reaches a lot of people. So, the install base is, in fact, the single most important part of an architecture.
  2. 13 min later
  3. 0:24:47 · watch on youtube.com

    Training is no longer limited by data but by compute, because most of the data models learn from is now synthetic.

    The amount of data that we use to train models is going to continue to scale to the point where we're no longer limited… Training is no longer limited by… Data is now limited by compute. And the reason for that is most of the data is synthetic.
  4. 1 min later
  5. 0:25:32 · watch on youtube.com

    Inference was never going to be the easy, cheap half of AI, because inference is thinking, and thinking is far harder than reading.

    that was always illogical to me because inference is thinking, and I think thinking is hard. Thinking is way harder than reading.
  6. 2 min later
  7. 0:27:44 · watch on youtube.com

    After pre-training, post-training and test-time scaling, the fourth scaling law is agentic: multiplying AI by spawning agents, and the whole loop scales on one thing, compute.

    And so the next scaling law is the agentic scaling law. It's kind of like multiplying AI. Multiplying AI, we could spin off agents as fast as you want to spin off agents. And so, you know, I… You know, I have four scaling laws.
  8. 0:28:12 · watch on youtube.com

    Intelligence is going to scale by exactly one thing, and that thing is compute.

    And so this loop, this cycle, is gonna go on and on and on. It kinda comes down to basically intelligence is gonna scale by one thing, and that's compute.
  9. 5 min later
  10. 0:33:13 · watch on youtube.com

    The idea that AI will destroy software and make tools unnecessary is ridiculous: an agent, like a humanoid in your kitchen, will use the tools that already exist.

    You know, a lot of people would say, "You know AI is gonna completely destroy software. We don't need software anymore. We don't even need tools anymore." That's ridiculous.
  11. 2 min later
  12. 0:35:26 · watch on youtube.com

    OpenClaw did for agentic systems what ChatGPT did for generative ones.

    And I think OpenClaw did for agentic systems what ChatGPT did for generative systems. And I just think it's a very big deal.
  13. 3 min later
  14. 0:38:51 · watch on youtube.com

    The cost of a token is falling by an order of magnitude every year, even as the price of the computers that make them goes up.

    You know, our computer price is going up, but our token generation effectiveness is going up so much faster that token cost is coming down. It's just coming down an order of magnitude every year.
  15. 12 min later
  16. 0:50:28 · watch on youtube.com

    Data centres should be built to degrade gracefully when the grid needs its power back, instead of demanding perfect uptime from utilities that have idle capacity most of the year.

    Now, the second thing is we have to build data centers that gracefully degrade.
  17. 8 min later
  18. 0:58:01 · watch on youtube.com

    Engineer from the physical limits first, then improve, rather than shaving a few days off a 74-day process by continuous improvement.

    I don't love the other methods, which is continuous improvement. The problem with continuous improvement, it… First of all, you should engineer something from first principles at the speed, you know, with speed of light thinking. Limit it only by physical limits, and physics limits. And after that, of course you would improve it over time.
  19. 6 min later
  20. 1:03:47 · watch on youtube.com

    China is the fastest-innovating country in the world today, on the strength of its talent, its open-source habit and its ferocious internal competition.

    So you get this rapid, incredible great talent, rapid innovation because of open source and just, you know, the nature of friends, and, and insane competition. Among the company, what emerges is incredible stuff. And so this is the fastest innovating country in the world today
  21. 4 min later
  22. 1:07:37 · watch on youtube.com

    Open-source models are fundamentally necessary for most industries, countries and researchers to join the AI revolution at all.

    And if everything is proprietary, it's hard to do research and it's hard to innovate on top of, around, with. And so… Open source is fundamentally necessary for many industries to join the AI revolution.
  23. 21 min later
  24. 1:28:10 · watch on youtube.com

    Someone paying a thousand dollars per million tokens is just around the corner, because intelligence is a product that segments by grade like phones do.

    You know, the idea that somebody's willing to pay $1000 per million tokens is just around the corner. It's not if, it's only when.
  25. 1 min later
  26. 1:29:08 · watch on youtube.com

    World GDP growth is certain to accelerate, and the share of GDP spent on computation will be a hundred times what it was, because a computer is now a factory rather than a warehouse.

    And so when you take these things in combination, I am absolutely certain that the world's GDP is going to accelerate in growth. I'm absolutely certain the percentage of that GDP that will be used for computation will be 100 times more than the past
  27. 1 min later
  28. 1:29:58 · watch on youtube.com

    NVIDIA can be a three-trillion-dollar-revenue company in the near future, because nothing physical stands in the way.

    And then the rest of it, to me, is: is it possible for NVIDIA to be a, you know, $3 trillion revenue company in the near future? The answer is, of course, yes. And the reason for that is because it's not limited by any physical limits.
  29. 27 min later
  30. 1:56:31 · watch on youtube.com

    Asked when an AI could build a billion-dollar business on its own: AGI has already arrived.

    I think it's now. I think we've achieved AGI.
  31. 4 min later
  32. 2:00:38 · watch on youtube.com

    The number of software engineers at NVIDIA will grow, not shrink, because the purpose of a job and the tasks it uses are related but not the same, as radiology already showed.

    The number of software engineers at NVIDIA is gonna grow, not decline. And the reason for that is because the purpose of a software engineer and the task of a software engineer coding are related, not the same.
  33. 1 min later
  34. 2:01:45 · watch on youtube.com

    Coding is now specification, and the number of people who can do it just went from thirty million to a billion.

    So the question is, how many people could do that? Describe a specification for a computer to go… telling the computer what to go build. How many people? I think we just went from 30 million to probably 1 billion. And so every carpenter in the future will be a coder
  35. 6 min later
  36. 2:07:20 · watch on youtube.com

    Between two graduates in any field, he would hire the one who is expert at using AI.

    If we were to hire a new college graduate today, and I have a choice between two, one that has no clue what AI is and one that is expert in using AI, I would hire the one who's expert in using AI.
  37. 6 min later
  38. 2:13:46 · watch on youtube.com

    Intelligence is a commodity, and it is not the same word as humanity.

    I don't over-fantasize about, and I don't over-romanticize about intelligence. Intelligence is… And people have heard me say it before, I actually think intelligence is a commodity.
  39. 4 min later
  40. 2:17:42 · watch on youtube.com

    He does not believe in succession planning; the real work is passing on knowledge continuously, and he hopes to die on the job.

    And so some of the things that of course are practical things, like how do we think about succession planning? And I'm famous in saying that I don't believe in succession planning.
  41. 7 min later
  42. 2:24:14 · watch on youtube.com

    Understanding the biological machine is about five years away, not ten.

    Understanding the biological machine is right around the corner. It's, it's not 10 years. It's five years probably.