korrents

korrents · piece

Why Good Product Ideas Don’t Survive

Itamar Gilad · 24 Sept 2026

Read the piece on itamargilad.com ↗

2 korrents from this piece ↓

Itamar Gilad did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. But the odds of finding such an idea are quite low. A/B-test research shows that the vast majority of ideas deliver little or no value; some even detract value. Analyze feature usage in your product and look at past roadmaps, and you’ll see a clear power law — a small minority of your ideas create significant impact. The reason is simple: in most products most low-hanging fruit have already been picked. The odds of coming up with something novel and truly good are quite slim.
  2. Prioritization relies heavily on our ability to discern good ideas from bad. Experience, intuition, and logic play a central role. However, the question “which of these 20 ideas will best achieve the goals” is a very complex one, and often there’s not enough information to answer it. Our brains are definitely not designed to deal with so much uncertainty, and we’re likely to subconsciously revert to mental shortcuts and heuristics to lighten the cognitive burden — risk aversion, halo effects, groupthink and many more. Some of the best ideas are novel, counterintuitive, or unimpressive, so they may not do well here.

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.