Read the piece on hils.substack.com ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Our reading
People are bad at predicting their own preferences; the option they actually pick is more telling.
Their wordsYou are essentially doing user research on yourself. Asking yourself “what would I like?” will result in unreliable answers for the same reason that asking users what they would like does -- people are bad at predicting their own preferences. Which card you actually pick is more telling than anything you would say in the abstract.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.