korrents

korrents · books

Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (W. W. Norton, 2005 edition; first published 1997)

Jared Diamond · c. 1997–2005

Read the book on archive.org ↗

1 person recommends it, on rcmnd ↗

7 korrents from this book ↓

Jared Diamond did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this book, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The book prints chapter headings its extracted text does not preserve, so the claims below are in the book's order but not grouped. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. invention is often the mother of necessity, rather than vice versa.
  2. History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves.
  3. The objection to such racist explanations is not just that they are loathsome, but also that they are wrong.
  4. In fact, I do not assume that industrialized states are “better” than hunter-gatherer tribes
  5. Far more Native Americans and other non-Eurasian peoples were killed by Eurasian germs than by Eurasian guns or steel weapons.
  6. In fact, many or most inventions were developed by people driven by curiosity or by a love of tinkering, in the absence of any initial demand for the product they had in mind.
  7. we should not suppose that the decision to adopt farming was made in a vacuum, as if the people had previously had no means to feed themselves.

Related books

Found from what the books talk about: claims worded alike in the archive's hourly pass, and subjects both are filed under. It is not a judgement that they agree — related books often argue the opposite. All books

Keep reading

The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.