Read the piece on carissaveliz.substack.com ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsA person doesn’t consent to being filmed by being a speaker, so you are in fact filming someone without their consent (unless you’ve asked them beforehand, naturally).
Their wordsit’s a fallacy to think that anything that happens in the public domain is fair game to film
Our reading
Surveillance has been normalized to the point that important conversations are not being had.
Their wordsI worry that we are not having many important conversations that need to be had because we have normalized surveillance to such an extent that it’s almost become the default.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.