korrents

korrents · piece

Why Gelsinger was wrong for Intel

Bryan Cantrill · 8 Dec 2024

Read the piece on bcantrill.dtrace.org ↗

3 korrents from this piece ↓

Bryan Cantrill did not write this page.

Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.

  1. Intel has a long, long (long!) track record of fostering innovation outside of its mainstay x86 product - and then killing it.
  2. Intel's strategic mistakes were (in my opinion) symptomatic of an acute cultural problem: the company still carried with it the inherited arrogance from an earlier age.
  3. While I think his dichotomy is a bit reductive, Ben Horowitz's nomenclature is useful here: Intel needed a wartime CEO - but in maintaining a dividend that it couldn't afford, Gelsinger was committing the ultimate peacetime act.

Keep reading