Read the piece on writing.kunle.app ↗
Every claim below was made in this piece, quoted word for word and numbered in the order the piece makes them, so you can read it there rather than take our word for it. The sentence above each quote is our reading of the claim, not their wording. Each quote was checked against a stored copy of the page at build time; where the two differ, the quote is the fact.
Their wordsThis was informed by my own experience with my throughput expanding at Substrate. In hindsight, I was thinking too narrowly: coding agents will replace the entire office “suite” for a large majority of white collar workers.
Their wordsIn the past, it took real skill to create a long document that was cogent and coherent. If you read something that was long and well written and cogent and coherent, you could kind of assume that the writer knew what they were talking about. Now you can’t.
Their wordsSeat based pricing will get a second lease on life: much has been written about the demise of seat based pricing, but I just don’t see CFOs underwriting variable spend for tools that 100% of the company will use.
Keep reading
The other pieces are the ones whose claims are worded most like this one's. That measures language, not agreement: they may argue the opposite.