korrents

A korrentour readingWhat is a korrent?

The scavenger-versus-hunter argument about T. rex is over: the bite marks show it did both.

Drawn from what Dave Hone said

A private bookmark. Not a position, and never counted.

What Dave Hone actually said

Word for word, with the source under each one. They did not write this page.

  1. Dave Hone

    Palaeontologist and reader in zoology at Queen Mary University of London

    They're obviously both. A, because we've got things like the bite marks I just described, which is pretty much definitive scavenging, and then we've got the healed bite marks with T-rex teeth buried in bones, which is pretty much definitive active predation. So we've got evidence of it doing both.

Added to korrents 4 Sept 2025 · How quotes work · Something wrong? Tell us

Do you hold this korrent?Do you also believe this?

Sign in to record that you hold this, with a confidence number of your own.

Related korrents

Our reading — they may agree, disagree or merely touch the same thing. Closest first: a shared subject counts for most, then how near the wording is.

On the map

Loading the map… or open it on its own page

Open the map on its own page →