Tap a claim on the ring to put it at the centre.
← The eternity of the universe is unproven, and a merely plausible…
8 connected korrents · 4 moments from 23 Jan 1657 to 7 Nov 2014.
Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject Same subject
Read this korrent: The eternity of the universe is unproven, and a merely plausible argument does not justify reading scripture figuratively
The eternity of the universe is unproven, and a merely plausible argument does not justify reading scripture figuratively
MM
Moses Maimonides — holds since c. 1190 — tap for who they are
Same subject: "There is no empirical evidence against my position" is not an argument for it. — tap to centre the map on it
"There is no empirical evidence against my position" is not an argument for it.
Last stated 12 years ago
7 Nov 2014
DL
Dan Luu — holds since 2014-11-07 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Disbelieving a church ruling on a matter of fact is not heresy, though it may be presumptuous, because on facts that authority is not infallible — tap to centre the map on it
Disbelieving a church ruling on a matter of fact is not heresy, though it may be presumptuous, because on facts that authority is not infallible
Last stated 370 years ago
23 Jan 1657
BP
Blaise Pascal — holds since 1657-01-23 — tap for who they are
Same subject: Where scripture seems to oppose a truth proved by philosophy, it admits of interpretation — tap to centre the map on it
Where scripture seems to oppose a truth proved by philosophy, it admits of interpretation
I(
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) — holds since c. 1126–1195 — tap for who they are
Same subject: A book with neither abstract reasoning about quantity or number nor experimental reasoning about fact should be burned as sophistry and illusion — tap to centre the map on it
A book with neither abstract reasoning about quantity or number nor experimental reasoning about fact should be burned as sophistry and illusion
DH
David Hume — holds since c. 1748 — tap for who they are
Same subject: No one with understanding could think a man believes in divine things yet not in gods — tap to centre the map on it
No one with understanding could think a man believes in divine things yet not in gods
SO
Socrates — holds since c. 399 BCE — tap for who they are
Same subject: No testimony suffices to establish a miracle unless its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact it seeks to establish — tap to centre the map on it
No testimony suffices to establish a miracle unless its falsehood would be more miraculous than the fact it seeks to establish
DH
David Hume — holds since c. 1748 — tap for who they are
Same subject: There is no reason to suppose an idea less true than reality, since we never know for certain what underlies the senses — tap to centre the map on it
There is no reason to suppose an idea less true than reality, since we never know for certain what underlies the senses
Last stated 132 years ago
28 Feb 1895
RT
Rabindranath Tagore — holds since 1895-02-28 — tap for who they are
Same subject: The argument from universal consent seems rather to show there are no innate principles, since none has universal assent — tap to centre the map on it
The argument from universal consent seems rather to show there are no innate principles, since none has universal assent
Last stated 337 years ago
24 May 1689
JL
John Locke — holds since 1689-05-24 — tap for who they are
same subject or similar wording bar: when it was last stated, on a scale from 1657 to today (stretched back to the oldest claim here) — full is today a face: someone who holds the claim — tap it for who they are